Benim C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız Başlarken Çalışmak

Benim C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız Başlarken Çalışmak

Blog Article

I know there başmaklık been a lot of posts on this but it still confuses me why should you pass in an interface like IList and return an interface like IList back instead of the concrete list.

Başarım Optimizasyonu: IList, veri erişimini optimize ederek uygulamanın başarımını fazlalıkrabilir ve akıl yönetimini iyileştirebilir.

Bu şehir, istenmeyenleri azaltmak için Akismet kullanıyor. Versiyon verilerinizin nasıl davranışlendiği karşı daha lüks olgun edinin.

David MillsDavid Mills 2,41511 gold badge2323 silver badges2525 bronze badges 6 2 The right approach really would have been to offer an ISortableList interface (with methods to sort a portion of the list using some particular comparer), have List implement it, and have a static method which could sort any IList by checking whether it implemented ISortableList and, if hamiş, copying it to an array, sorting that, clearing the IList, and re-adding the items.

This will allow me to do generic processing on almost any array in the .Safi framework, unless it uses IEnumerable and derece IList, which happens sometimes.

The Liskov Substitution Principle (simplified) states that a derived type should be able to be used in place of a base type, with no additional preconditions or postconditions.

Remove Silinmesini istenilen kıymeti siler. Silinecek şayan liste süresince birden fazla olması durumunda ilk kıymeti kaldırır. Bu metodu ekseri C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız referans tipler ile ölçü çıkarmak kucakin kullanılır. Lakin paha tipleri ile bile kullanılabilir.

If you specify your methods to return an interface that means you are free to change the exact implementation later on without the consuming C# IList Nasıl Kullanılır method ever knowing.

In VS2008, when I click on the service reference and select "Configure Service Reference", there C# IList Nedir is an option to choose how the client de-serializes lists returned from the service.

Want to improve this question? Update the question so it emanet be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.

It is like this other question. The other question shares a lot of common ground, but is arguably not a true duplicate. In either case though, this is not opinion-based. What may have happened is that the C# IList Nedir closer might have just looked at this question's title, without reading the question itself. The body is objective.

Is IList a good fit for your organisation? If a colleague asks you to change a method signature to use IList instead of List, ask them how they'd add an element to an IList. If they don't know about IsReadOnly (and most people don't), then don't use IList. Ever.

This will help if you decide to change the implementation of your class later to use a different concrete class. In that case the users of your library won't need to update their code since the interface doesn't change.

The other general C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız reason for using interfaces is to expose the minimal amount of knowledge necessary to the user of an object. Consider the (contrived) case where I have a veri object that implements IList.